Re: if_gif/if_bridge problem
- From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:23:07 +0700
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:57:48AM -0500, Boris Kochergin wrote:
bridge0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu
1500
ether 3e:7f:e8:ef:f6:a4
inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15
maxage 20 holdcnt 6 proto rstp maxaddr 100 timeout 1200
root id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 ifcost 0 port 0
member: gif6 flags=143<LEARNING,DISCOVER,AUTOEDGE,AUTOPTP>
[skip]
So, the tunnels and bridges appear to be sending the traffic around
properly, but the concentrator machine isn't replying to ARP requests
for its bridge0 interface's IP. This is where I'm stuck. Any help is
appreciated.
The problem is that if_bridge(4) won't work this way - with only one gif-member
without patching. I've faced this recently and debugged it in detail.
Then I've produced a patch and now I run it over a month in production
without a problem:
ftp://www.kuzbass.ru/pub/freebsd/lagg-0.1.tgz
Description inside, in Russian. In short: if_gif(4) no more kills
ethernet frames returned by if_bridge(4) as designated for upper levels
of TCP/IP stack but really passes them there. If the patched system
does not have EtherIP-tunnels then the patch affects nothing,
so it's safe to apply it. Also, you need not to reboot the system
if you load if_gif/if_bridge as modules, just rebuld and reload these.
The patch applies to all of 6.2, 6.3-PRERELEASE and 7.0-PRERELEASE,
and works (tested).
My task was a bit more complex so the patch touches if_lagg(4) too
but you need not use lagg(4) if you do not need it. The patch just
contains the solution for your problem too.
You can read detailed discussion in Russian there:
http://groups.google.com/group/fido7.ru.unix.bsd/browse_thread/thread/d6787b865515a66a/488d738afc265b19
Eugene Grosbein
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: if_gif/if_bridge problem
- From: Boris Kochergin
- Re: if_gif/if_bridge problem
- References:
- if_gif/if_bridge problem
- From: Boris Kochergin
- if_gif/if_bridge problem
- Prev by Date: if_gif/if_bridge problem
- Next by Date: Hping/Ping
- Previous by thread: if_gif/if_bridge problem
- Next by thread: Re: if_gif/if_bridge problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
- Re: if_gif/if_bridge problem
... Eugene Grosbein wrote: ... Then I've produced a patch and now I run it
over a month in production ... Description inside, in Russian. ... If the patched
system ... (freebsd-net) - Re: MSBLASTER Infecting despite 03-026 patch?
... >used came straight from Microsoft so I don't suspect a faulty patch. ...
We have not heard of a patched system being compromised yet. ... (Incidents) - CARP without address on the physical interface ?
... (Basicly I'm looking at carping a bridge0 ... This patch has been
merged into obsd's -HEAD best I can see. ... (freebsd-net)