RE: Hping/Ping
- From: "Dave Raven" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:50:34 +0200
Hi Ingo,
Unfortunately I am stuck using FreeBSD 4.11 for this, so the em
driver options don't include rx_processing_limit. They do have rx and tx
_int_delay which I have played with but hasn't made a different.
As I understand polling might help if I had a load problem but my processor
is idle and it only happens after a day or more?
A netstat -na|wc -l gives over 7000 connections, but that shouldn't be a
problem? I have plenty mbufs and mbuf clusters available ..
Thanks
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Ingo Flaschberger [mailto:if@xxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 8:45 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Hping/Ping
Dear Dave,
I have set my icmplim to 1024. When it was 200 I would sometimes get abut
warning about an OPEN port RST - which was also strange to me (that it was
open not closed). I suspected that it was because 5% of my packets where
being dropped though.
The server is under reasonable load (networking wise) around 80-90mbits,
the processor is 75% idle..1-2
The other strange this is that a reboot solves this, and it takes around
days to happen again..
you can try to enable polling:
kern.polling.reg_frac=20
kern.polling.user_frac=10
kern.polling.burst_max=1000
and perhaps tune rx_processing limit:
dev.em.0.rx_processing_limit: 100
you can also look at all open sessions when the server is in trouble:
netstat -n
Kind regards,
Ingo Flaschberger
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- RE: Hping/Ping
- From: Dave Raven
- RE: Hping/Ping
- From: Ingo Flaschberger
- RE: Hping/Ping
- From: Dave Raven
- RE: Hping/Ping
- From: Ingo Flaschberger
- RE: Hping/Ping
- From: Dave Raven
- RE: Hping/Ping
- From: Ingo Flaschberger
- RE: Hping/Ping
- From: Dave Raven
- RE: Hping/Ping
- From: Ingo Flaschberger
- RE: Hping/Ping
- From: Dave Raven
- RE: Hping/Ping
- From: Ingo Flaschberger
- RE: Hping/Ping
- From: Dave Raven
- RE: Hping/Ping
- From: Ingo Flaschberger
- RE: Hping/Ping
- Prev by Date: Re: question about change in inet_ntoa.c
- Next by Date: RE: Hping/Ping
- Previous by thread: RE: Hping/Ping
- Next by thread: RE: Hping/Ping
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|