Re: anyone tried the Multi routing table code yet?
- From: "Rajkumar S" <rajkumars@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 13:48:15 +0530
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 6:09 AM, Julian Elischer <julian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
subject says it all really..
I am using pf and rtable to setfib and get an pfctl: DIOCADDRULE:
Device busy when trying to load "pass in quick on fxp0 from any to any
keep state rtable 1"
I can successfully load "pass in quick on fxp0 all flags S/SA keep
state rtable 0" I am testing on FreeBSD CURRENT.
My routing tables are:
[root@daemon /etc]# setfib -0 netstat -nrf inet
Routing tables
Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire
default 192.168.3.100 UGS 0 2025 fxp0
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0 lo0
192.168.3.0/24 link#1 UC 0 0 fxp0
192.168.3.54 00:40:f4:b7:d7:ee UHLW 1 40 fxp0 1179
192.168.3.100 00:80:48:38:1a:df UHLW 2 149 fxp0 1173
192.168.4.0/24 link#1 UC 0 0 fxp0
192.168.4.4 00:80:48:1f:48:26 UHLW 1 141 fxp0 1120
192.168.5.0/24 link#3 UC 0 0 rue0
[root@daemon /etc]# setfib -1 netstat -nrf inet
Routing tables
Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire
default 192.168.5.4 UGS 0 13 rue0
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0 lo0
192.168.3.0/24 link#1 UC 0 0 fxp0
192.168.3.54 00:40:f4:b7:d7:ee UHLW 1 0 fxp0 1176
192.168.3.100 00:80:48:38:1a:df UHLW 1 5 fxp0 1170
192.168.4.0/24 link#1 UC 0 0 fxp0
192.168.4.4 00:80:48:1f:48:26 UHLW 1 0 fxp0 1117
192.168.5.0/24 link#3 UC 0 0 rue0
btw, does the rtable syntax allow to set route for packets generated
by the pf host itself (like packets from squid). The catch is that
they cannot be matched via a "pass in" rule, they are matched only on
a "pass out" rule.
Thanks and regards,
raj
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: anyone tried the Multi routing table code yet?
- From: Julian Elischer
- Re: anyone tried the Multi routing table code yet?
- References:
- anyone tried the Multi routing table code yet?
- From: Julian Elischer
- anyone tried the Multi routing table code yet?
- Prev by Date: Re: Testing lagg
- Next by Date: carp and vlan at the same time?
- Previous by thread: Re: anyone tried the Multi routing table code yet?
- Next by thread: Re: anyone tried the Multi routing table code yet?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|