Re: ZFS and 'traditional' nfs-export
- From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:54:33 +0100
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:46:00AM +0100, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Hello,
I googled a bit on this question but could not find
a clear answer :
is there any risk/inconvenience/advantage in exporting
a ZFS-fs by just putting it in /etc/exports the old
way and leaving the 'sharenfs' option on the filesystem off?
I'd like to replace a UFS-based server serving mostly
linux-clients which work well now with a ZFS-fs, and somehow
am a bit waterfearing changing the nfsèoptions which worked
great till now.
You can safely use /etc/exports without touching sharenfs property.
--
Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl
pjd@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!
Attachment:
pgph4m4q9C25y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- ZFS and 'traditional' nfs-export
- From: Arno J. Klaassen
- ZFS and 'traditional' nfs-export
- Prev by Date: Re: Hi. Regarding "automatic vlan creation"
- Next by Date: Re: kern/140051: [bce] [arp] ARP not sent through Bridge Firewall with BCE network dirver
- Previous by thread: Re: ZFS and 'traditional' nfs-export
- Next by thread: bce(4) BCM5907 CTX write errors on 7.2 driver
- Index(es):