Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD
- From: Hartmut Brandt <hartmut.brandt@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:20:02 +0100 (CET)
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Alexander Bubnov wrote:
AB>I am sorry may be I am going to ask often asked question... Why not to
AB>implement features which is lacking in net-snmp for FreeBSD instead of
AB>writing new snmp (bsnmp)? As a plus net-snmp has BSD like license.
Many years ago I needed a small SNMP daemon for controlling some
equipment. I looked at ucd-snmp (that was the name than) but decided
against it because it was far too big. The even bigger problem was, that
it didn't care about handling errors in the places I looked at. I use
bsnmp alot in projects to do remote monitoring controlling of equipment -
you don't need SNMPv3 for them and it is easy to write a new MIB for
bsnmp.
harti
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD
- From: Alexander Bubnov
- Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD
- References:
- Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD
- From: Vasyl Samoilov
- Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD
- From: Harti Brandt
- Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD
- From: Alexander Bubnov
- Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD
- Prev by Date: Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD
- Next by Date: Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD
- Previous by thread: Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD
- Next by thread: Re: Poor situation with snmp support in FreeBSD
- Index(es):