Is it true that Microsoft uses BSD's Stack?
From: Jonathan (j.e.drews_at_worldnet.att.net)
Date: 09/21/03
- Previous message: Dan Langille: "The FreeBSD Diary: 2003-08-31 - 2003-09-20"
- Next in thread: Yannick Van Osselaer: "Re: Is it true that Microsoft uses BSD's Stack?"
- Reply: Yannick Van Osselaer: "Re: Is it true that Microsoft uses BSD's Stack?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:50:05 -0500
Hi:
I came across this statement while looking for info on why desktop software
can be so buggy:
Excerpt:
"How many non-technical people know that, at least as far as I know, one
of the primary reasons Microsoft's NT and Win2k etc. actually works and
remains stable on a LAN is that they used the BSD TCP/IP code. How
pathetic it is that Microsoft, with all their billions, can't write
clearly defined protocol stack software, uses open-source BSD's, and
then spends millions trying to stymie open-source software! "
From:
http://anumail1.anu.edu.au/pipermail/link/2002-August/020463.html
Is this true? That the Win 2000 and NT machines uses BSD code?
-- Kind regards, Jonathan _______________________________________________ freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-newbies-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Dan Langille: "The FreeBSD Diary: 2003-08-31 - 2003-09-20"
- Next in thread: Yannick Van Osselaer: "Re: Is it true that Microsoft uses BSD's Stack?"
- Reply: Yannick Van Osselaer: "Re: Is it true that Microsoft uses BSD's Stack?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]