Re: ports on a CD

From: Pat Lashley (patl+freebsd_at_volant.org)
Date: 09/23/03

  • Next message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: ports on a CD"
    Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 17:32:37 -0700
    To: Tadimeti Keshav <keshav_tadimeti@yahoo.co.uk>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org
    
    

    --On Tuesday, September 23, 2003 00:59:30 +0100 Tadimeti Keshav
    <keshav_tadimeti@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

    > Is it possible to get all of the ports on a CD set?
    > This is one area where Linux fares better. Debian
    > offers a 7 CD (OK they don'y make ISOs) set that
    > contains all packages.

    The short answer is "No".

    Some of the ports have licencing restrictions that
    prevent that.

    Now if you're just talking about the ports that may
    legally be included on the CD set; it's a space tradeoff.
    Adding more would mean more than 4 CDs in the set,
    which would raise the cost of producing them. Which
    would in turn raise the price to end-users.

    On the whole, I'd rather keep the current setup and
    see about putting more into a DVD based release...

    > I think the FreeBSD distribution would be better off
    > having all ports on the 2 additional CDs rather than
    > have packages. For starters we get 5 window managers.
    > We could easily do w/o KDE & GNOME and have JRE/JDK
    > and OOo instead.

    You might; but others would take the opposite position.
    I suspect that if a vote were taken KDE and GNOME would
    get more votes than Java and OOo.

    And having packages makes the system install -MUCH-
    faster. You really don't want to make new users wait
    while the entire GNOME suite is compiled. There are
    already complaints that the installation process takes
    too long.

    > I might just have to give up FreeBSD
    > for the reason that downloading ports is turning out
    > to be expensive.

    Sounds like a business opportunity. Make and sell
    CD sets with the 'missing' ports. Every couple of
    months, a new snapshot of the entire ports tree with
    all of the legally-CD-able distfiles; for people who
    don't have the (cheap) bandwidth to stay up to date
    with cvsup...

    -Pat
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-newbies-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Kris Kennaway: "Re: ports on a CD"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: portupgrade O(n^m)?
      ... wanted to try and port sections of portupgrade and its related tools to ... in 15 mn to 20 mn you have your packages. ... because packages don't break when compiling. ... pkg_add for around 500 ports replaced. ...
      (freebsd-hackers)
    • Re: portupgrade O(n^m)?
      ... in 15 mn to 20 mn you have your packages. ... >> because packages don't break when compiling. ... >> packages for installation are already present on the machine. ... >> modifying the origins of the ports. ...
      (freebsd-hackers)
    • Re: [HOW-TO] cvsup for ports -- Re: compact portsnap db
      ... It is better to use all ports or all packages so either do: ... people install php at all. ... And yes there are some ports that don't have packages for licencing ... Preferring cvsup to portsnap is kinda like preferring vim ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: [HOW-TO] cvsup for ports -- Re: compact portsnap db
      ... The only problems I've ever seen with installing packages is that at ... And yes there are some ports that don't have packages for licencing etc ... though I can't recall ever having to install one of those. ... >> Preferring cvsup to portsnap is kinda like preferring vim over ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: newbie package/ports questions
      ... I have an updated ports tree using portsnap (fetched and extracted ... everything compile from ports and it seems to work fine, but packages ... would of course be faster to install. ... portupgrade -NPRr kde ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)