Re: 4.9 or 5.2.1 ?
From: Olivier Gautherot (ogautherot_at_freesurf.fr)
Date: 02/27/04
- Previous message: Eelco Zwart: "4.9 or 5.2.1 ?"
- In reply to: Eelco Zwart: "4.9 or 5.2.1 ?"
- Next in thread: Bolli Pálmason: "Re: 4.9 or 5.2.1 ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "Eelco Zwart" <eelco.zwart@planet.nl>, <freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:25:57 +0100
If you're a newbie, I would recommend 5.2.1. I use it happily. 4.9 is more for
people who want to keep compatibility with earlier releases.
Cheerio
Olivier
On Friday 27 February 2004 14:21, Eelco Zwart wrote:
> I've read a lot (book and this lists) and now I finally going to install
> FBSD!
>
> My first choice was to install 4.9 stable but after 5.2.1 was released I
> started to doubt.. Can anyone give me a good reason why not to start with
> 5.2.1 as a newbie ?
>
> It's just a 'play-around' installation ...
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-newbies-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-newbies-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Eelco Zwart: "4.9 or 5.2.1 ?"
- In reply to: Eelco Zwart: "4.9 or 5.2.1 ?"
- Next in thread: Bolli Pálmason: "Re: 4.9 or 5.2.1 ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|