Re: General Unix Learning

From: Joshua Tinnin (krinklyfig_at_spymac.com)
Date: 09/12/04

  • Next message: Dan Langille: "The FreeBSD Diary: 2004-08-22 - 2004-09-11"
    To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org
    Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 23:21:59 -0700
    
    

    On Tuesday 07 September 2004 12:15 pm, "hide110" <hide110@us-it.net>
    wrote:
    > Please forgive me if this is not the right place to turn but, I
    > figure you all would be able to share your wisdom with me.
    >
    > I am a Windows user and I've hated it for the past few years.

    I can relate, though I still keep it around for games and sometimes
    sound production stuff (which is really better on a Mac ...). I don't
    like Windows, but it still has its uses for me.

    > The
    > Unix experience I have accrued has mainly been working from a shell
    > account; nothing really in detail about the actual operating system
    > or installation. I have considered FreeBSD & Linux, but really, for a
    > desktop system do you guys think it's viable for a nearly pure unix
    > newbie to tinker around with BSD? Or would it be easier to start
    > with Linux & eventually port over to BSD?

    Well, I never took to Linux like some people, though I used it
    occasionally over the years and basically understood it, but when I
    discovered FreeBSD, everything was suddenly so much more logical - it
    made so much more sense. It's not as "user-friendly" as many Linux
    distros, but the way everything fits together - from the complete
    system approach to the ports system - makes it much easier to maintain
    and less hassle all around. Even Linux made more sense after I started
    learning FreeBSD. It does require some commitment on your part to learn
    it, but it's time well spent. Like others have mentioned, FreeBSD is
    more of a "pure" Unix-like OS than Linux is, but this means if you
    learn it you'll understand Unix (and by extension other *nixes) much
    better.

    > Normally I'd take my own advice (if you want to use BSD, use BSD, if
    > you want to use Linux at the end of the day, use that) but I'm just
    > trying to be practical with all learning curves taken into
    > consideration.

    Try both - seriously, and you should try more than one Linux distro,
    too. I have Slackware, Win2k and FreeBSD on one machine - FreeBSD gets
    the most use, though Win gets fired up when I want to play a game (some
    good games have been written for *nix, but Win is still the only
    serious gaming platform). When it comes down to it, if you're going to
    use a window manager or desktop, it will look pretty much the same on
    any system - KDE on FreeBSD looks the same as it does on Linux, but
    what's underneath is what counts. Linux does have an edge with hardware
    support, but quite a lot of hardware works on FreeBSD. I'm running on a
    2GHz AthlonXP on an Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe with an 8xAGP ATI Radeon
    9600XT. For a while, I didn't have 3D support in FreeBSD (though it
    worked in Linux), but after upgrading to 5.3 beta3 I now have it - this
    was not a big deal even when it wasn't there, as I don't play many
    games in *nix. As far as Linux, if you want to go the easy route, try
    Mandrake or SuSE. If you want "pure" Linux, try Slackware, and some of
    the other hardcore people tend to distros like Debian and Gentoo - the
    latter is interesting, as it uses an installation helper called
    portage, which was inspired by BSD's ports. Although some people swear
    by it, I'd avoid anything-Red Hat (e.g., Fedora). RPMs are a nightmare.
    And after you've tried at least a couple distros of Linux, try FreeBSD
    and compare. It may not be right for you, but you might not want to use
    anything else after you do ... hey, happened to me ;)

    > My deepest apologies if I should not be asking something like this
    > here. But any replies would be terribly appreciated.

    No, this is great - we finally have some on-topic conversation! W00t!

    - jt
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-newbies-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Dan Langille: "The FreeBSD Diary: 2004-08-22 - 2004-09-11"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: wine
      ... > results to running in linux and windows. ... > performance gap in freebsd. ... The linux version under redhat 9 gives me a better framerate ... Its a shame we can't get native games for freebsd. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Why BSD?
      ... BSD is arguably more popular. ... releases used FreeBSD 3.2 or NetBSD code. ... The other question on my mind is the future of Linux. ... there are two groups of distros of linux.. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: FreeBSD 4.x Opteron Question
      ... the FreeBSD developers told everyone that 5.3 was da ... initially over linux not because there's a bunch of good guys on the ... My tests measure kernel performance; ... > a networking device is a key performance indicator. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Newbie Experience
      ... I've only been around since FreeBSD 5.4 ... FreeBSD kernel too. ... always sunshine and linux is farts. ... in the hey day of AT&T Unix I'm ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Review of FreeBSD 5.4
      ... but not less problems compared to FreeBSD. ... If you like to have a bleeding edge system using debian --- just go ... > the linux kernel suffers. ... When the kernel suffers, everyone who uses ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)