Re: Which Version of FreeBSD?

From: Nikolas Britton (freebsd_at_nbritton.org)
Date: 09/30/04

  • Next message: Erika Medeiros: "Burn an audio CD from mp3 files"
    Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:36:10 -0500
    To: michael2043@comcast.net
    
    

    -CURRENT or -STABLE should not be used in production environments.
    FreeBSD in general is very stable and well tested but if you want the
    most stable it would be the 4.x branch.
    The following is a snippet from page 119 of Michael Lucas's book,
    Absolute BSD: The Ultimate Guide to FreeBSD.
    -----------------------------------
    Which Release Should You Use?
    FreeBSD uses the same release system as it does for quality control.
    Though it may seem like a
    complex system, it allows users to rest assured that a release is
    supported by the community, and
    that it has been through peer review and extensive testing. That same
    user knows that the nifty new
    features in -stable and -current are available, if she's willing to pay
    the price.
    So which release should you use?

    Production: If you're using FreeBSD in a production setting, track the
    security branch of a
    -release.

    Test: If you're a network administrator interested in seeing how changes
    in FreeBSD will
    affect your environment, track -stable on a test system.

    Development: If you're an operating system developer, have too much
    spare time and too
    little excitement, or are a blind idiot, -current is for you. When
    -current destroys your MP3
    collection, debug the problem and submit a patch to correct it.

    Hobby: If you're a hobbyist, you can run any version! Just keep in mind
    the limitations of the
    branch you're using. If you're just learning UNIX, -release is what you
    want. Once you have
    your feet under you, upgrade to -stable. If you have nothing better to
    do, and have nothing
    but utter contempt for your data, you're welcome to join the masochists
    over in -current.
    --------------------------------------

    Michael G. Goodell wrote:

    >Which release of FreeBSD is best for a production environment? I am aware of
    >the different branches of development: CURRENT, STABLE, RELEASE and I
    >*think* I understand the meaning of each from what I have read. Perhaps not
    >since I am writing this question! But, what I would like to know is when I
    >am setting up a production system, or desktop for that matter, which is
    >considered *THE* most stable of the choices in versions. Is it in the 4.x
    >branch, 5x etc...
    >
    >Where can I get clarification on this topic - any direction would be
    >welcome.
    >

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-newbies-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Erika Medeiros: "Burn an audio CD from mp3 files"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Security Announcements & Incremental Patches
      ... >> conservative set of changes intended for our next mainstream release'. ... > generating production server for example. ... You have to get critical security ... users than FreeBSD is so far beyond naive to be an out-and-out lie. ...
      (FreeBSD-Security)
    • Re: Need suggestions for a very secure web server with plone
      ... > I am working on setting up a web server with plone. ... > I am considering three alternatives - Slackware, FreeBSD and OpenBSD. ... IIRC Plone uses Zope. ... induce downtime if you are trying to get a production box reconfigured. ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
    • Operating System Evaluation
      ... Our firm is conducting an operating system evaluation to select a new server ... The application is already in production use. ... FreeBSD in our evaluation. ... not want the general public to know the details of their platform product ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip
      ... It's not the FreeBSD communities fault if you don't have a non-critical ... machine to test a cvsup, before going "live" in a production environment. ... Most respectable companies with mission critical servers would do so. ...
      (FreeBSD-Security)
    • RE: SMP Performance (Was: Re: Are hardware vendors starting to bail ... )
      ... I agree with few posters that FreeBSD performance have been lacking behind. ... Personally, I've never found HT to be a performance boost, and I run 9 'production hosting servers' ... ... on a simple production server, not doing much, I doubt anyone would ever see the file system deadlocks ... ...
      (freebsd-questions)