Re: Freebsd and performance

From: Ryan Sommers (ryans_at_gamersimpact.com)
Date: 10/20/04

  • Next message: clayton rollins: "RE: Problems compiling mplayer sources from the site."
    Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:18:24 -0500
    To: "n.v.t n.v.t" <joefso@hotmail.com>
    
    

    n.v.t n.v.t wrote:

    > Know you guys coming close to the 5.3 -stable release alot of users
    > are going to upgrade/switch, right, because this is what we have been
    > waiting for. What about the performance that 4.X had? Will the
    > performance be equal ? Will it be having better performance? Even on
    > low end machines? And especially sinds freebsd is becoming more and
    > more ready for desktop use, performance is a big issue on
    > desktops.(look at Gnu/Linux for example, which I have been using for a
    > very long time know, and all I can remember is that almost all of the
    > releases have scheduling/latency issues. When I was using 2.2/2.4/2.6
    > All I have seen where low latency patches. What about freebsd?

    I speak for myself only and not re@, but no. 5.3 will not (yet) have the
    same performance 4.x had. So far 5.x has been about upgrading some of
    our major subsystems with more modernization, like a multithreading
    kernel, multithreaded kernel subsystems, eliminating Giant, etc. All of
    these things are not the tried-and-true of 4.x, they are new. Likewise
    they may not outperform 4.x, yet. I imagine once RELENG_5_3 is cut and
    -STABLE is adopted we will see more and more performance related
    patches. Eventually the 5.x branch will achieve the stability 4.x has to
    offer.

    > I have only been reading the bsd section at slashdot so I don't know
    > much about the progress you guys are making on the feature release. Is
    > there a offical news site for freebsd users? Like openbsd has
    > *deadly.org.

    www.freebsd.org. www.daemonnews.com I think carries some news.
    Otherwise, subscribe to current@. That's a pretty good way to see
    information about what is going on.

    > If those things are taking a while to be there, does fbsd have any
    > kernel patches like linux does to improve desktop performance? For
    > example like: http://members.optusnet.com.au/ckolivas/kernel/

    Lord, I hope not. One of the reasons I dislike Linux (and there are
    many) is how much independent, unofficial, hard-to-find, incompatible,
    and distribution specific development goes on. If you have patches that
    would benefit the project, why not submit them?

    -- 
    Ryan Sommers
    ryans@gamersimpact.com
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-newbies-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: clayton rollins: "RE: Problems compiling mplayer sources from the site."

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: FreeBSD as VM host OS?
      ... *) qemu works well on FreeBSD in my experience, ... have reported success in using qemu as the host VM. ... Xen patched kernel sources was the show stopper, ... what in the world the patches may do if installed with other patches. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: FreeBSD hacker 101
      ... many exciting network stack projects/overhaul happening in FreeBSD 8. ... tweaking some of the kernel modification and compilation process so that i ... Building toochains, submitting patches etc.... ... you should seriously consider upgrading to ...
      (freebsd-hackers)
    • Re: FreeBSD as VM host OS?
      ... OS speed at or close to native hardware speeds. ... *) jails provide virtual hosting at native speed, but _only_ for FreeBSD ... Xen patched kernel sources was the show stopper, ... what in the world the patches may do if installed with other patches. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Freebsd and performance
      ... > are going to upgrade/switch, right, because this is what we have been ... > All I have seen where low latency patches. ... What about freebsd? ... kernel, multithreaded kernel subsystems, eliminating Giant, etc. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Freebsd and performance
      ... > are going to upgrade/switch, right, because this is what we have been ... > All I have seen where low latency patches. ... What about freebsd? ... kernel, multithreaded kernel subsystems, eliminating Giant, etc. ...
      (freebsd-current)