Re: Problems make installing xorg

From: Tom Huppi (thuppi_at_huppi.com)
Date: 01/21/05

  • Next message: Xian: "Re: Noob boo boo with samba"
    Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 04:33:14 -0500 (EST)
    To: Joaquin Menchaca <linuxuser@finnovative.net>
    
    

    On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Joaquin Menchaca wrote:

    > Hi.
    >
    > I'm a total newbie to building stuff. I just tried to build something
    > like xorg, and I get the following. :'(
    >
    > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found

    This has something to do with package databases, or some database
    which tracks vulnerabilities. I forgot the details, but when I
    looked into it (via a search of 'google groups') I concluded that
    it was not a real big deal for my situation.

    > ===> Extracting for xorg-6.7.0_1
    > ===> Patching for xorg-6.7.0_1
    > ===> xorg-6.7.0_1 depends on shared library: X11.6 - found

    This is because you have not first pkg_delete'd (or alternate?)
    XFree86. That library came from an earlier installation. xorg
    (the meta-port) has decided that it doesn't need to do much
    because it has found a rather important prerequisite. If it had
    not found this, it would have proceeded to build it. Both XFree86
    and xorg build a library of this name. This is actually a really
    good thing because it means that for the most part, older
    applications built against XFree86 will usually work fine with no
    re-building. In some instances they won't, however, but I
    believe them to be quite rare at present.

    There is a thread including me about a week ago which discusses
    this issue. Probably you can find that on google as well, but I
    don't know for sure...am rebuilding my browser at the moment and
    can't check.

    There is also an interesting thread which I ran across involving
    the mechanics of how ports determine their prerequisites. The
    xorg/XFree86 instance was used as an example. Though it works,
    there is something of a deficiency in the system at present which
    makes it important to run 'pkgdb' after installing xorg. That was
    what I took away from the discussion as the thing to remember.

    Good luck with things,

     - Tom
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-newbies-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Xian: "Re: Noob boo boo with samba"

    Relevant Pages

    • RE: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed
      ... >> I'm sorry to step on the toes of the port maintainer but instead ... As a matter of fact I just installed xfree86 a week ago, from scratch, ... But I have no problems in building xorg on FreeBSD 5, ... >maintainers to keep things working on 4.X whenever possible. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • RE: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed
      ... >> I'm sorry to step on the toes of the port maintainer but instead ... As a matter of fact I just installed xfree86 a week ago, from scratch, ... But I have no problems in building xorg on FreeBSD 5, ... >maintainers to keep things working on 4.X whenever possible. ...
      (freebsd-stable)
    • Re: Trying to determine XFree86 version
      ... that you're NOT running XFree86. ... SuSE changed over to default to the usage of Xorg windowing system ... similar to SuperProbe. ... examine the file for information regarding your video system. ...
      (alt.os.linux.suse)
    • Re: Trying to determine XFree86 version
      ... > that you're NOT running XFree86. ... SuSE changed over to default to the usage of Xorg windowing system ... > similar to SuperProbe. ... > examine the file for information regarding your video system. ...
      (alt.os.linux.suse)
    • Re: nv driver support Asus N6600 video card?
      ... You should be using Xorg ... > Debian is still using XFree86 in Sarge and Etch. ... nVidia module if he doesn't want to move to Xorg just yet.... ...
      (comp.os.linux.hardware)