Upgrading Automake

From: Cody Holland (cody.holland_at_gmail.com)
Date: 01/23/05

  • Next message: Joshua Tinnin: "Re: Discovered a new browser..."
    Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:19:50 -0600
    To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org
    
    

    This may sound kinda dumb, but I'm pretty new to the FreeBSD
    environment. I'm trying to add an new package and am getting:

    This port is deprecated; you may wish to reconsider installing it:
    Please use devel/automake19 instead.

    Stop in /usr/ports/devel/automake15.
    *** Error code 1

    So I went and installed the port for automake19....but when i go to
    add the package it still tries to use automake15. Can anyone tell me
    what i'm doing wrong?
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-newbies-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Joshua Tinnin: "Re: Discovered a new browser..."

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Strange capture of my eth0 interface.
      ... but I doubt if there is any connection. ... so I did a fresh install. ... > then seeing that the package manager does indeed detect the switch - don't ... > Port numbers are like telephones. ...
      (comp.os.linux.security)
    • Re: amd64 questions
      ... so if you want to install a 64 bit package ... install of a 32-bit pkg with its dependencies. ... them (ie libraries in /usr/lib32). ... have a broken copy of the tarball the port is using. ...
      (freebsd-hackers)
    • Re: amd64 questions
      ... amd64 object files. ... so if you want to install a 64 bit package ... My copy of the port sets that for amd64 already. ...
      (freebsd-hackers)
    • Re: Do VPN connections effectively bypass Firewalls?
      ... Destination port: 80 ... Where the internal IP would be NAT'd by the firewall ...
      (comp.security.firewalls)
    • Re: Do VPN connections effectively bypass Firewalls?
      ... Destination port: 80 ... Where the internal IP would be NAT'd by the firewall ...
      (comp.security.firewalls)