Re: Is there a particular order in which things should be done?

From: Kevin Kinsey (kdk_at_daleco.biz)
Date: 02/02/05

  • Next message: Robert Marella: "Re: Is there a particular order in which things should be done?"
    Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 12:16:18 -0600
    To: crzdgns1@starpower.net
    
    

    crzdgns1@starpower.net wrote:

    >Hello,
    >
    >I am a beginning FreeBSD/UNIX user and have recently installed
    >FreeBSD-5.3-RELEASE, Xorg, and KDE on a Pentium II Celeron 330
    >MHz custom made PC.
    >
    >
    >

    Cool. Or is that, "kewl" ? Regardless, Welcome to FreeBSD!

    >Everything seems to be working ok for now,
    >but I feel completely overwhelmed because there is a tremendous
    >amount of info to learn.
    >
    >

    That's probably a normal feeling. What you get from FreeBSD
    is a stable, versatile and highly-customizable, relatively fast and
    secure, high-performance powerful operating system with great
    documentation and a (mostly) friendly, knowledgeable user community.

    The price you pay is something like this: you must learn to use
    the system instead of assuming that you can just have a "clicky
    Wizard" for every task, you must read the docs, you must use
    your intellectual power and personal "people skills" to join the
    community. Once in a while you will have to solve problems that
    seem pretty confusing, far-fetched, or unorthodox.

    But, it will be *your* machine.

    So far, you seem to be on the right track. You kinda sound
    like you think you need to reinstall your system. But, you
    say, "Everything seems to be working ok for now" .... so,
    I wouldn't. Read on if you have the time...

    >Yesterday, when I logged out of KDE and
    >back into command mode, I noticed a line in the output produced
    >during KDE bootup (is that the right lingo?) that my machine thinks it
    >is badly misconfigured. The exact message was "could not find local
    >host, your system is badly misconfigured".
    >

    Well, that is a problem, but only a small one in terms of
    fixing it. "Badly misconfigured" simply seems to mean,
    in this case, that this simple item is real important to KDE. And,
    indeed, it's pretty important to the whole system, but it's not a
    big deal for you, most likely.

    The computer needs to be able to find "localhost", because that
    is him/her/itself. (Does a computer have a gender ... hmm, weird.)
    Do you have a file under /etc entitled 'hosts'? If so, it should have
    something like this in it:

    # In the presence of the domain name service or NIS, this file may
    # not be consulted at all; see /etc/nsswitch.conf for the resolution order.
    #
    #
    ::1 localhost localhost.my.domain
    127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.my.domain

    Now, note also the commented paragraph. In my setup, /etc/nsswitch.conf
    is:

    hosts: files dns

    So, the resolver will check the "hosts" file first, and then check DNS.
    When it reads /etc/hosts, it will discover that "localhost" is on the
    loopback address (127.0.0.1).

    >Here are my questions for
    >this forum. I preface my questions by saying that what I did was boot
    >from floppies and install via FTP. All at once, I installed FreeBSD
    >with Xorg and all of its fonts, Perl, Postfix, and every file in the KDE
    >directory, and something else that I've already forgotten.
    >
    >

    Well, cool. That's a lot of work to do all at once.

    You could even pat yourself on the back. I've been using FreeBSD
    almost 4 years and still haven't installed some of that stuff ;-)

    >Since I am
    >a beginner, I expect I will go through the installation procedure a few
    >more times, but maybe I can be more efficient about it in the future.
    >So here is my question, in the future, what recommendations would
    >the community make about correct order of operations for installation
    >and configuration, and for confirmation that the install and
    >configuration are "correct"?
    >
    >

    Well, it depends on what you want. For example, for an ftp server,
    I just install FBSD with nothing, basically (e.g., the "base system").

    I've setup a couple desktop machines, and I'm beginning to think
    that the best thing to do is clone disks, or just make big tarballs
    of everything on the "master", install base on the "slave", and
    then untar everything into place, reboot, and change the important
    stuff (/etc/rc.conf and so forth).

    You could install base and then install "instant-workstation" from
    ports. It's a meta port that installs a set of stuff that one guy
    (who's quite smart) thinks should make a good workstation.
    Be forewarned, his ideas and your ideas probably aren't the
    same. For one, he doesn't care much for "eye candy", so you'll
    never find him running GNOME or KDE, I don't think.

    What this is really all boiling down to is that FreeBSD is so
    versatile and highly customizable that there's no one way to
    do anything. A long-time "Unix" maxim is "tools, not policy."
    If you want a GUI, there are two or three ways to install one
    and dozens of window managers and/or preset environments.
    Plus, each app you add creates new facets to the environment
    you already have. If you want a CLI text editor, there are about 57
    varieties waiting for you to install, for free.

    What I would really "recommend" is that you find something that
    works for you, maybe take notes on the procedure, and then alter
    them as you learn new things that would impact your installation
    routines.

    And, really, I find myself reinstalling that Much-vaunted-other-o$
    quite a bit more often then I reinstall a BSD. It's pretty much just
    HDD failure or a major version bump (such as the recent introduction
    of 5.X as a "production version", and really it was probably *possible*
    to just move from 4.X to 5.X in place). In FreeBSD, reinstalling is
    generally *not* the solution, as we've become accustomed to think
    from (many of us) using other OSes.

    I'm sure someone has pointed you toward (or you discovered for
    yourself) the Handbook (www.freebsd.org/handbook). It really
    is the user's best friend ... especially for us "newbs".

    Once again, Welcome!

    HTH,

    Kevin Kinsey
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-newbies-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Robert Marella: "Re: Is there a particular order in which things should be done?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 250, Issue 2
      ... FreeBSD 7.1R on laptop ... Busy disk and page fault ... Re: Which install? ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: info
      ... > desktop pcs I looking for important information about whitch distribution ... FreeBSD would be a good choice. ... in KDE for your desktop, ... KDE is probably by far the most popular to use, and very simple to install. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Is FreeBSD just a sandbox for hackers?
      ... there's still only Gnome and KDE (maybe later ... most people who complain that FreeBSD isn't easy enough to install never does anything else about it - they just complain. ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
    • Re: BigApache for Windows - Why doesnt BSD have an installer package like this ???
      ... FreeBSD comes with two different ... No need to install third-party software just to ... This is why it initially seems hard to use BSD. ... * Packages do not require any additional compilation. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Release Schedule for 2006
      ... > to run KDE from Generic has been an additional headache. ... > I was hoping that 6.0 would enable me to move ahead on my FreeBSD ... For me the issue is very simple - I need to install ... That's the beauty of the ports system. ...
      (freebsd-stable)