Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:01:36 EST
To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org
I currently own a server 100mbit unmetered.2gbram.600gbsata and have huge
files in my server i was thinking to get 4x300gb scsi ..should i stick for sata
or scsi? i get free replacement if a hard drives brakes* ..yes i am running
freebsd.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-newbies-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Re: ????SATA or SCSI???? ... I only discount SATA because of their lineage. ... I perceive SATA as having a higher failure rate than SCSI in a server... Les Connor [SBS Community Member - SBS MVP] ... (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
Re: SCSI or SATA ... I concurr with John...... I know that SATA are supposed to be slower than SCSI,... >>> existing Server has SCSI drives and need your advise on the new server. ... (microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz2000)
Re: SATA drives... ... as a subsitute for SCSI.... for the investment of a new server, OS, backup system, etc. ... relative risk of the lower-cost SATA.... > SCSI drives are designed for servers running 24*7. ... (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
Re: need suggestions on Hardware ... I've heard that SCSI is on the way out, and quite frankly I don't really ... I would like to find out what is the best server and disk system ... Now, SATA drives certainly will be cheaper, but that's ... > etc. so it is impossible to give any guidelines as to server solutions.... (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
Re: SATA vs SCSI ... >We're looking at switching to Windows 2003 and buying another server to host ...>SQL Server and Exchange. ... complex answer I guess: is it still best to stick with SCSI... I've read some positive reviews of the SATA Raptor versus ... (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage)
