Confused about connection between an option in rc.conf and the associated action?
From: Ola Theander (ola.theander_at_otsystem.com)
Date: 03/13/05
- Previous message: admin-list_at_deathnet.id.au: "Re: Chroot and shell"
- Next in thread: Sancho2k.net Lists: "Re: Confused about connection between an option in rc.conf and the associated action?"
- Reply: Sancho2k.net Lists: "Re: Confused about connection between an option in rc.conf and the associated action?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: <freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 02:49:39 +0100
Dear subscribers
I'm slightly confused about enabling an option in rc.conf and the associated
action? E.g. say that I enable gateway_enable="YES" or maybe
dhcpd_enable="YES", how does FreeBSD associate this simple line to the
associated action? I've had a theory that adding e.g. test_enable="YES" to
rc.conf would trigger the execution of the file /etc/rc.d/test.sh at boot
time but it seems like this isn't how it's done.
Any clarification on this matter would be greatly appreciated.
Kind regards, Ola Theander
_______________________________________________
freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-newbies-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: admin-list_at_deathnet.id.au: "Re: Chroot and shell"
- Next in thread: Sancho2k.net Lists: "Re: Confused about connection between an option in rc.conf and the associated action?"
- Reply: Sancho2k.net Lists: "Re: Confused about connection between an option in rc.conf and the associated action?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
