Re: ten thousand small processes
From: David O'Brien (freebsd-performance_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 06/23/03
- Previous message: Michael Nottebrock: "Re: ten thousand small processes"
- In reply to: Michael Nottebrock: "Re: ten thousand small processes"
- Next in thread: D. J. Bernstein: "Re: ten thousand small processes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 19:24:17 -0700 To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 08:00:59PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> On Saturday 21 June 2003 22:02, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> > That is a question for gcc@gcc.gnu.org. We use a 99% stock GCC 3.2.2.
>
> On 4.8? :)
We use a 97% stock GCC 2.95.3. So it is still a question for
gcc@gcc.gnu.org.
-- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Michael Nottebrock: "Re: ten thousand small processes"
- In reply to: Michael Nottebrock: "Re: ten thousand small processes"
- Next in thread: D. J. Bernstein: "Re: ten thousand small processes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]