Re: ten thousand small processes
From: D. J. Bernstein (djb_at_cr.yp.to)
Date: 06/28/03
- Previous message: D. J. Bernstein: "Re: The dangers of replacing malloc()"
- In reply to: Chuck Swiger: "Re: ten thousand small processes"
- Next in thread: Chuck Swiger: "Re: ten thousand small processes"
- Reply: Chuck Swiger: "Re: ten thousand small processes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 28 Jun 2003 06:56:40 -0000 To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Chuck Swiger writes:
> If you'd like to implement your suggested changes, generate a patch
> (preferably via 'diff -duw'), you may either submit it as a PR via the
> 'send-pr' command, or you can post it to this list. It would be nice if
> you performed some regression testing to confirm that your change works and
> is beneficial not just for your specific circumstances, but for the general
> case as well.
Does FreeBSD have a suite of regression tests and speed tests, or would
I have to make them up as I go along?
---D. J. Bernstein, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics,
Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: D. J. Bernstein: "Re: The dangers of replacing malloc()"
- In reply to: Chuck Swiger: "Re: ten thousand small processes"
- Next in thread: Chuck Swiger: "Re: ten thousand small processes"
- Reply: Chuck Swiger: "Re: ten thousand small processes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]