Re: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database
From: Jason Stone (freebsd-performance_at_dfmm.org)
Date: 07/21/03
- Previous message: Tom Samplonius: "Re: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- In reply to: Tom Samplonius: "Re: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- Next in thread: Sean Chittenden: "Re: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- Reply: Sean Chittenden: "Re: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- Reply: Jim C. Nasby: "Re: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 05:06:47 -0700 (PDT) To: <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>, <freebsd-database@freebsd.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Tom Samplonius wrote:
> Softupdates on, async off. Softupdates is just a better async.
postgresql fsync's all its files before returning from a commit in order
to ensure durability, right? Does softupdates interfere with the
functioning of sync(2)/fsync(2)?
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > I would recommend 4.8 over 5.1. Especially if you intend this to be
> > a production server. 5.1 is not ready for public consumption.
>
> Public consumption, yes. Production consumption, no.
I recently decided to take up the issue of migrating towards 5.1 at my
company. The way I dealt with it was to publish all of my services to 5.1
boxes and run regression tests. For me, 5.1 provided adequate
performance, and since 5.1 is on the branch where all new dev work is
going on and 4.x is going to be end-of-lifed in the not-too-distant
future, I decided to go with 5.1.
Personally, I would only go with 4.8 if testing showed 5.1 to be
inadequate for your particular situation with your particular apps,
hardware, load, etc. But you can only tell that by testing.
-Jason
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Freud himself was a bit of a cold fish, and one cannot avoid the suspicion
that he was insufficiently fondled when he was an infant.
-- Ashley Montagu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
Comment: See https://private.idealab.com/public/jason/jason.gpg
iD8DBQE/G9dYswXMWWtptckRAkrNAKD6NjeQW9kFS8J//fxec1qWVUVqaACgzTmM
zeAG240i4H11u/yM/FI0E1w=
=wFfZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Tom Samplonius: "Re: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- In reply to: Tom Samplonius: "Re: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- Next in thread: Sean Chittenden: "Re: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- Reply: Sean Chittenden: "Re: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- Reply: Jim C. Nasby: "Re: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|