Re: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database

From: Alexander Leidinger (Alexander_at_Leidinger.net)
Date: 07/21/03

  • Next message: XR: "network performance testing" 
    Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 14:15:44 +0200
To: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com>

    On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 14:53:33 -0700 (PDT)
    Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com> wrote:

    > Well, 5.1 is considerably less crippled by Giant than 4.8. Well,
    > "crippled" is not a good description. "Impaired" is better. 5.1 SMP
    > performance is less Giant impaired than 4.8. That's a good thing.

    The critical parts for the desired operations are still covered by the
    Giant lock (e.g. tcp stack, ata subsystem).

    > > over takes 4.X in terms of speed, is the subject of great debate, but
    > > many are optimistic that it will be at some point, just not at the
    > > moment. 5.X, will however (and without much doubt), scale much better
    > > than 4.X on multiple processor machines, though I'm not sure where
    > > that stands at the moment in terms of being completed and should
    > > likely be directed to current@ or questions@ instead of here. -sc
    >
    > Yes, 5.1 is better on multiple CPUs. So if 5.1 works for you, it is
    > going to work faster than 4.8 on SMP.

    Did you measured that, and if yes, which set of operations do you have
    banchmarked?

    On -current we still have reports that 5.1 is still not as fast as 4.8
    (and nobody @FreeBSD.org is surprised, as the target is to first get a
    stable 5.x line and after that a fast&stable one).

    Bye,
    Alexander. 

    -- 
Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
http://www.Leidinger.net                       Alexander @ Leidinger.net
  GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91  3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: XR: "network performance testing"
    • Quantcast