Re: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database
From: Mikko Työläjärvi (mbsd_at_pacbell.net)
Date: 07/22/03
- Previous message: Tom Samplonius: "Re: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- In reply to: Dan Langille: "Re: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- Next in thread: David Miller: "Re: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 09:31:51 -0700 (PDT) To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 21 Jul 2003 at 20:35, Jason Stone wrote:
>
> > I feel like this is an extremely important point. If softupdates changes
> > the semantics of sync(2)/fsync(2), then it absolutely has to be off for a
> > postgresql server because postgresql counts on fsync in order to make its
> > durability guarantees.
>
> If this means all FreeBSD-PostgreSQL users need to change their
> setup, we need to do something ASAP. I'd first recommend getting the
> confirmation from the PostgreSQL team, then adjusting the PostgreSQL
> documenation and the FreeBSD port.
>
> Does anyone feel this is urgent enough that they'll do something
> about it?
I think you can relax. Check the mailing lists, or google a bit and
you'll find similar discussions. For example:
<http://www.ornl.gov/cts/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2000/02/msg00703.html>
In short: fsync() works with soft-updates. Too many things would
break otherwise.
$.02,
/Mikko
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Tom Samplonius: "Re: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- In reply to: Dan Langille: "Re: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- Next in thread: David Miller: "Re: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|