RE: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database
From: Tom Samplonius (tom_at_sdf.com)
Date: 07/26/03
- Previous message: Michael E. Conlen: "RE: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- In reply to: Michael E. Conlen: "RE: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- Next in thread: Rod Taylor: "RE: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- Reply: Rod Taylor: "RE: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 19:29:50 -0700 (PDT) To: "Michael E. Conlen" <meconlen@obfuscated.net>
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Michael E. Conlen wrote:
> I was concerned about the disk cache because of this link
>
> http://www.varlena.com/varlena/GeneralBits/Tidbits/perf.html#shbuf
>
> which says...
<inaccurate PostgreSQL info deleted>
> But now that I have looked a bit more I see that this link
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/aw_pgsql_book/hw_performance/node6.html
...
I would go with the information from the PostgreSQL site. It is at
least reviewed by the developers (if not written by them).
Tom
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Michael E. Conlen: "RE: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- In reply to: Michael E. Conlen: "RE: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- Next in thread: Rod Taylor: "RE: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- Reply: Rod Taylor: "RE: Tuning for PostGreSQL Database"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]