Re: FW: 20TB Storage System
From: Poul-Henning Kamp (phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk)
Date: 09/02/03
- Previous message: Max Clark: "RE: FW: 20TB Storage System"
- In reply to: Max Clark: "RE: FW: 20TB Storage System"
- Next in thread: Petri Helenius: "Re: FW: 20TB Storage System"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: "Max Clark" <max.clark@media.net> Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 22:12:30 +0200
In message <ILENIMHFIPIBHJLCDEHKEEMIDCAA.max.clark@media.net>, "Max Clark" writ
es:
>I know adding ccd/vinum to the equation will lower my IO throughput, but the
>question is... if I have an external hardware shelf with 3.5TB (16 250GB
>drives w/ Raid 5 from hardware) and I put a Raid 0 stripe across 3 of these
>shelves what would my expected loss of IO be?
The loss will mostly be from latency, but how much is impossible to
tell I think.
The statistics of this, even with my trusty old Erlang table would
still be too uncertain to be of any value.
-- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Max Clark: "RE: FW: 20TB Storage System"
- In reply to: Max Clark: "RE: FW: 20TB Storage System"
- Next in thread: Petri Helenius: "Re: FW: 20TB Storage System"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|