Re: FW: 20TB Storage System

From: Petri Helenius (pete_at_he.iki.fi)
Date: 09/02/03

  • Next message: Max Clark: "RE: FW: 20TB Storage System"
    Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 23:33:55 +0300
    To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
    
    

    Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

    >>2) What is the maximum size of a filesystem that I can present to the host
    >>OS using vinum/ccd? Am I limited anywhere that I am not aware of?
    >>
    >>
    >
    >Good question, I'm not sure we currently know the exact barrier.
    >
    Just make sure you run UFS2, which is the default on -CURRENT because
    UFS1 has
    a 1TB limit.

    >>3) Could I put all 20TB on one system, or will I need two to sustain the IO
    >>required?
    >>
    >>
    >
    >Spreading it will give you more I/O bandwidth.
    >
    >
    >
    Can you say why? Usually putting more spindles into one pile gives you
    more I/O,
    unless you have very evenly distributed sequential access in pattern you
    can predict
    in advance.

    Pete

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Max Clark: "RE: FW: 20TB Storage System"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: FW: 20TB Storage System
      ... Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: ... I'm not sure we currently know the exact barrier. ... Just make sure you run UFS2, which is the default on -CURRENT because ... >Spreading it will give you more I/O bandwidth. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: FW: 20TB Storage System
      ... Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: ... I'm not sure we currently know the exact barrier. ... Just make sure you run UFS2, which is the default on -CURRENT because ... >Spreading it will give you more I/O bandwidth. ...
      (freebsd-hackers)