Re: 20TB Storage System (fsck????)

From: Petri Helenius (pete_at_he.iki.fi)
Date: 09/03/03

  • Next message: Chuck Swiger: "Re: 20TB Storage System (fsck????)"
    Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 21:22:59 +0300
    To: Max Clark <max.clark@media.net>
    
    

    Max Clark wrote:

    >Ohh, that's an interesting snag. I was under the impression that 5.x w/ PAE
    >could address more than 4GB of Ram.
    >
    >
    It does. However as long as a pointer is 32 bits, your address space for
    a process
    is maxed out at 4G which translates to about 2.5G user after kernel and
    other
    things have taken their toll.

    >If fsck requires 700K for each 1GB of Disk, we are talking about 7GB of Ram
    >for 10TB of disk. Is this correct? Will PAE not function correctly to give
    >me 8GB of Ram? To check 10TB of disk?
    >
    PAE functions correctly but does not provide for 7G address space.

    >Is there anyway to bypass this requirement and split fsck into smaller
    >chunks? Being able to fsck my disk is kinda important.
    >
    >
    Yes, you do that by splitting up the filesystem to smaller filesystems.
    Kind of obvious?

    >I have zero experience with either itanium or opteron. What is the current
    >status of support for these processors in FreeBSD? What would the preferred
    >CPU be? Will there be PCI cards that I would not be able to use in either of
    >these systems?
    >
    >
    I´m personally biased towards the Opteron, but that´s more based on that
    it makes
    more sense than their technical merits so far (because neither has too
    much).

    Both CPU´s should work fine with 5.2 according to the TODO list.
    Meanwhile I suggest
    you play with the number of inodes on the 10TB filesystem and see how
    that affects
    the memory usage.

    Pete

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Chuck Swiger: "Re: 20TB Storage System (fsck????)"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: 20TB Storage System (fsck????)
      ... >could address more than 4GB of Ram. ... However as long as a pointer is 32 bits, ... Being able to fsck my disk is kinda important. ... you do that by splitting up the filesystem to smaller filesystems. ...
      (freebsd-hackers)
    • Weird harddisk behaviour
      ... A couple of weeks ago my 400Gb SATA disk crashed. ... Partition Table for /dev/sda ... # Type Sector Sector Offset Length Filesystem Type Flag ... Superblock backups stored on blocks: ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Strange case of root filesystem corruption
      ... Yesterday GRUB would suddenly not display the boot menu anymore. ... Looking at filesystems on the disk with the free ufs2tools program, ... Subfolders of / on the same filesystem are affected as well. ... sectors/track: 63 ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: Making a bootable second hard disk (and larger filesystems)
      ... >filesystem on disk2 and it has to be bootable. ... >backup on second hard disk, ... under "root" and let both discs in the server? ... If you do only "dd" you may want to boot a "Knoppix" CD. ...
      (comp.unix.sco.misc)
    • Re: DVD-RAM slowness and questions
      ... to know when it's done writing to the disk. ... > with a non-journaling filesystem such as ext2 or FAT? ... you've got the wrong idea about journalling, ... > driver responsibility, then how do I know if Linux is doing it? ...
      (comp.os.linux.hardware)