Re: 20TB Storage System (fsck????)
From: Brooks Davis (brooks_at_one-eyed-alien.net)
Date: 09/03/03
- Previous message: Chuck Swiger: "Re: 20TB Storage System (fsck????)"
- In reply to: Chuck Swiger: "Re: 20TB Storage System (fsck????)"
- Next in thread: Brooks Davis: "Re: 20TB Storage System (fsck????)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 12:47:34 -0700 To: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 03:37:35PM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Piotr KUCHARSKI wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:37:50PM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> >>I'm wary of the write-performance hit from putting too many drives wide
> >>in a RAID-5 (or -5,0) configuration.
> >
> >How many is "too many"?
>
> At one point, the advice used to be to use between four and seven disks for
> a RAID-5 volume. For example, the Apple XServe RAID box has 14 bays, but
> Apple seems to recommend configuring it as two 7-drive RAID-5 volumes,
> rather than a single 14-drive-wide RAID-5 volume.
As far as I can tell from taking one of ours apart, that's not
recommendation, that's a hard limit due to the system design. The
XServe RAID is two 100% independent 7-disk RAID systems. If you look at
the controller boards, each one has four High-Point ATA controllers which
means it can only access 8 disks with reasonable performance. There
appears to be no communication between the halves of the systems.
-- Brooks
-- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Chuck Swiger: "Re: 20TB Storage System (fsck????)"
- In reply to: Chuck Swiger: "Re: 20TB Storage System (fsck????)"
- Next in thread: Brooks Davis: "Re: 20TB Storage System (fsck????)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|