Re: 20TB Storage System

From: David Schultz (das_at_FreeBSD.ORG)
Date: 09/06/03

  • Next message: Terry Lambert: "Re: 20TB Storage System"
    Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 15:03:37 -0700
    To: David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca>
    
    

    On Fri, Sep 05, 2003, David Gilbert wrote:
    > >>>>> "Poul-Henning" == Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes:
    >
    > Poul-Henning> In message <3F5647F3.5080502@he.iki.fi>, Petri Helenius
    > Poul-Henning> writes:
    > >> fsck problem should be gone with less inodes and less blocks since
    > >> if I read the code correctly, memory is consumed according to used
    > >> inodes and blocks so having like 20000 inodes and 64k blocks should
    > >> allow you to build 5-20T filesystem and actually fsck them.
    >
    > Poul-Henning> I am not sure I would advocate 64k blocks yet.
    >
    > Poul-Henning> I tend to stick with 32k block, 4k fragment myself.
    >
    > Poul-Henning> This is a problem which is in the cross-hairs for 6.x
    >
    > That reminds me... has anyone thought of designing the system to have
    > more than 8 frags per block? Increasingly, for large file
    > performance, we're pushing up the block size dramatically. This is
    > with the assumption that large disks will contain large files.
    >
    > ... but I havn't seem that, myself. Large arrays that we run tend to
    > have multiple system images (for diskless or semi-diskless operation)
    > and many more thousands of users ... all with their usual complement
    > of small files.
    >
    > It strikes me that driving the block size up (as far as 1M) and having
    > a 256 (or so) fragments might become appropriate.
    >
    > We probably also need to address disks with larger block sizes soon,
    > but that's another issue alltogether.

    To that end, UFS2 is supposed to be able to support ``jumbo
    blocks''. The code for that isn't in the tree, but I presume Kirk
    is working on it.
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Terry Lambert: "Re: 20TB Storage System"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: 20TB Storage System
      ... > That reminds me... ... has anyone thought of designing the system to have ... > more than 8 frags per block? ... > with the assumption that large disks will contain large files. ...
      (freebsd-hackers)
    • Re: 20TB Storage System
      ... > That reminds me... ... has anyone thought of designing the system to have ... > more than 8 frags per block? ... > with the assumption that large disks will contain large files. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: 20TB Storage System
      ... David Gilbert wrote: ... > That reminds me... ... has anyone thought of designing the system to have ... size bitmap used by frags may be treated incorrectly. ...
      (freebsd-hackers)
    • Re: 20TB Storage System
      ... David Gilbert wrote: ... > That reminds me... ... has anyone thought of designing the system to have ... size bitmap used by frags may be treated incorrectly. ...
      (freebsd-performance)
    • Re: 20TB Storage System
      ... David Gilbert wrote: ... > That reminds me... ... has anyone thought of designing the system to have ... size bitmap used by frags may be treated incorrectly. ...
      (freebsd-questions)