Re: Please help me tune FreeBSD for bulk.fefe.de/scalability/

From: Jeff Roberson (jroberson_at_chesapeake.net)
Date: 10/25/03

  • Next message: Oliver Lehmann: "Re: Please help me tune FreeBSD for bulk.fefe.de/scalability/"
    Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 20:13:48 -0400 (EDT)
    To: Lukas Ertl <l.ertl@univie.ac.at>
    
    

    On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote:

    > On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Felix von Leitner wrote:
    >
    > > Please also tell me if you have suggestions for other benchmarks that
    > > say something about the scalability of an operating system, that I could
    > > (and should) include in my benchmark suite.
    >
    > If you have some spare time, I'd really be interested in how the new
    > SCHED_ULE scheduler compares against the traditional (default) SCHED_4BSD
    > scheduler (although SCHED_ULE has been designed for SMP, some UP results
    > are sure nice to have).

    ULE has developed some performance problems. I'm not sure where they came
    from but I will be working on it in the next few weeks. Until then I
    wouldn't recommend any benchmarking with it unless the CPU affinity will
    really be a huge win.

    >
    > Regarding performance tuning: did you already look at accf_http(9) and/or
    > accf_data(9)? (Although it would probably need some rewrite of your
    > code...)
    >
    > regards,
    > le
    >
    > --
    > Lukas Ertl eMail: l.ertl@univie.ac.at
    > UNIX Systemadministrator Tel.: (+43 1) 4277-14073
    > Vienna University Computer Center Fax.: (+43 1) 4277-9140
    > University of Vienna http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/
    > _______________________________________________
    > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
    > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
    > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    >

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Oliver Lehmann: "Re: Please help me tune FreeBSD for bulk.fefe.de/scalability/"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: ULE/SCHED_SMP diff for 7.0, buildkernel & thanks.
      ... With regards to buildkernel times; I do not want to sacrafice performance on other benchmarks to improve buildkernel. ... ULE is also faster at various networking benchmarks for similar reasons. ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: Fastcode Pentium M Target
      ... We have a Pentium M laptop at work. ... Regards, ... > Hi Fastcoders and Followers ... > Does somebody volunteer to run all of the benchmarks on a PM? ...
      (borland.public.delphi.language.basm)
    • Re: B&V Results question
      ... Best regards ... and sorry about the confusion. ... I uploaded the files at work but did all the work at home, I'll get the missing benchmarks up there. ... When my copy of D2007 gets in I'm seriously thinking about developing a web service or something to automatically handle this stuff and provide some automatic useful feedback. ...
      (borland.public.delphi.language.basm)
    • Re: Fastcode MM B&V 0.56
      ... The biggest news is that my fantastic MM completed the benchmarks. ... Best regards ... Dennis Kjaer Christensen ...
      (borland.public.delphi.language.basm)
    • FastCode MM B&V 0.54
      ... > Use CPUID based selection of Move in Move benchmarks. ... > Best regards ... > Dennis Kjfr Christensen ... - Run each validation and benchmark in a separate process. ...
      (borland.public.delphi.language.basm)