Re: FreeBSD data size tuning

From: Eric Anderson (anderson_at_centtech.com)
Date: 11/21/03

  • Next message: veedee_at_c7.campus.utcluj.ro: "promise sx4000 drivers" 
    Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 08:08:39 -0600
To: tec@mega.net.br

    TEC Meganet wrote:

    >it's here
    >http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.9R/announce.html
    >

    It says:
    "We encourage all our users to evaluate FreeBSD 5.1 and the upcoming
    5.2. Because PAE support has only been a feature in 4.X for a few
    months, it has not received wide-spread testing, and our most
    conservative users may wish to stay with FreeBSD 4.8 until they choose
    to migrate to 5.X."

    Which is a lot different than:

     "The BSd people suggest not using 4.9in production servers."

    >Peter Pentchev (roam@ringlet.net) wrote*:
    >
    >
    >>On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:12:03PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
    >>Content-Description: signed data
    >>
    >>
    >>>On Friday 21 November 2003 10:52, TEC Meganet wrote:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>>The BSd people suggest not using 4.9
    >>>>in production servers.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>They do?
    >>>
    >>>
    >>No. Or at least, I know of no such thing, and it would be interesting
    >>to learn where and who and how has anything like that been suggested :)
    >>
    >>

    Eric 

    -- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Anderson	   Systems Administrator      Centaur Technology
All generalizations are false, including this one.
------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: veedee_at_c7.campus.utcluj.ro: "promise sx4000 drivers"

    Relevant Pages

    • RE: Quality of FreeBSD
      ... Does word "production" mean something to FreeBSD project ... Probably it is no longer important to support chip ... > rapid release cycle with a less agressive feature set. ... > deployment as I'd like, so it's also something that really isn't ...
      (freebsd-stable)
    • Re: How to turn DNS off in sshd_config?
      ... >> is a feature, not a bug. ... The solution is to fix your naming setup. ... I use putty to connect to freebsd. ... Sometimes connection fails and I need to restart ppp (it ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
    • Re: Anthonys drive issues.Re: ssh password delay
      ... The meaning and cause ... >> hardware to test on, or just going back to windows so you can ignore ... I doubt many people here would request a feature for MS, ... > I don't think they'd approve of FreeBSD. ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: amd64 NVIDIA support in FreeBSD 7
      ... I am aware that currently 3D accelerated support for Nvidia cards is ... ultimately provide support to the amd64 platform. ... is it realistic to think they will be MFC'ed to FreeBSD 7.x or will ... A problem with that feature list is that the specification is not ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: How to turn DNS off in sshd_config?
      ... > is a feature, not a bug. ... The solution is to fix your naming setup. ... I use putty to connect to freebsd. ... Sometimes connection fails and I need to restart ppp (it ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)