Re: FreeBSD data size tuning

From: TEC Meganet (tec_at_mega.net.br)
Date: 11/21/03

  • Next message: Eric Anderson: "Re: FreeBSD data size tuning"
    To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
    Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:42:37 +0000
    
    

    now you're touching the art of speaking and understanding ... certainly also a
    performance so it fits well here :)

    if the maker of the software says stay with the old one until the newer one is
    ready it is for me a very clear statement, special in context with talking about
    PAE

    or the writer should learn to write better ...

    Eric Anderson (anderson@centtech.com) wrote*:
    >
    >TEC Meganet wrote:
    >
    >>it's here
    >>http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.9R/announce.html
    >>
    >
    >It says:
    >"We encourage all our users to evaluate FreeBSD 5.1 and the upcoming
    >5.2. Because PAE support has only been a feature in 4.X for a few
    >months, it has not received wide-spread testing, and our most
    >conservative users may wish to stay with FreeBSD 4.8 until they choose
    >to migrate to 5.X."
    >
    >Which is a lot different than:
    >
    > "The BSd people suggest not using 4.9in production servers."
    >
    >>Peter Pentchev (roam@ringlet.net) wrote*:
    >>
    >>
    >>>On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:12:03PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
    >>>Content-Description: signed data
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>>On Friday 21 November 2003 10:52, TEC Meganet wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>>The BSd people suggest not using 4.9
    >>>>>in production servers.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>They do?
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>No. Or at least, I know of no such thing, and it would be interesting
    >>>to learn where and who and how has anything like that been suggested :)
    >>>
    >>>
    >
    >Eric
    >
    >--
    >------------------------------------------------------------------
    >Eric Anderson Systems Administrator Centaur Technology
    >All generalizations are false, including this one.
    >------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    >
    >

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Eric Anderson: "Re: FreeBSD data size tuning"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Greetings and salutaions..
      ... > since I have sucessfully installed FreeBSD 4.8 using the boot ... Congratulations and welcome to FreeBSD! ... everyday learning experience and the more you learn, ... > understanding of and for the world of computing. ...
      (freebsd-newbies)
    • Re: /dev/shm
      ... > If you're talking about Plan 9 or Inferno, ... > history of finishing their filesystems and understanding why it's done ... I see that FreeBSD implements procfs, which is along the same lines. ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: FreeBSD data size tuning
      ... TEC Meganet wrote: ... >performance so it fits well here:) ... "our most conservative users" to mean "our users who never apply patches ... I can't argue with your interpretation - it's perfectly valid. ...
      (freebsd-performance)
    • Re: Overheating attributed to Freebsd --sysctl variables not available--
      ... >> What version of FreeBSD are you using? ... >> Did you compile amp into the kernel? ... > I think you're not understanding what I posted @ ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • du -s causes reboot
      ... FreeBSD 4.9p7. ... I have a new Dell PowerEdge 1750 that is giving me fits. ... I have a ~/src directory containing source tarballs that are unpacked. ...
      (freebsd-questions)