Re: strange performance dip shown by iozone
From: Charles Swiger (cswiger_at_mac.com)
Date: 02/20/04
- Previous message: mi+mx_at_aldan.algebra.com: "Re: strange performance dip shown by iozone"
- In reply to: mi+mx_at_aldan.algebra.com: "Re: strange performance dip shown by iozone"
- Next in thread: Gary Stanley: "Re: strange performance dip shown by iozone"
- Reply: Gary Stanley: "Re: strange performance dip shown by iozone"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:27:33 -0500 To: mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com
On Feb 20, 2004, at 11:47 AM, mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
> Also, is the RAID5 writing speed supposed to be _so much_ worse, than
> that of a single disk?
it's normal for RAID-5 write performance to be slower than that of a
bare drive. RAID filesystems involve tradeoffs between cost,
performance, and reliability. RAID-5 maximizes cost and reliability at
the expense of performance....
-- -Chuck _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: mi+mx_at_aldan.algebra.com: "Re: strange performance dip shown by iozone"
- In reply to: mi+mx_at_aldan.algebra.com: "Re: strange performance dip shown by iozone"
- Next in thread: Gary Stanley: "Re: strange performance dip shown by iozone"
- Reply: Gary Stanley: "Re: strange performance dip shown by iozone"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|