Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld)
From: Oliver Lehmann (lehmann_at_ans-netz.de)
Date: 02/23/04
- Previous message: Gary Stanley: "Re: strange performance dip shown by iozone"
- Next in thread: Alain Fauconnet: "Re: Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld)"
- Reply: Alain Fauconnet: "Re: Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld)"
- Reply: Nikos Ntarmos: "Re: Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld)"
- Maybe reply: Oliver Lehmann: "Re: Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld)"
- Maybe reply: Chuck Swiger: "Re: Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld)"
- Reply: Wilko Bulte: "Re: Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld)"
- Reply: David O'Brien: "Re: Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:21:03 +0100 To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Hi,
I run several buildworld's on both, an Alpha EV56 and a Intel PII. I'm
wondering that the Pentium beats the Alpha. Both systems have INVARIANTS*
and WITNESS* disabled. Furthermore, no special tweakups - nearly "out of
the box" configured.
Alpha EV45, 600MHz, single CPU
768MB RAM
UW-SCSI SEAGATE ST34573W 6244
running: 5.2.1-RC2 (15th Feb 2004)
building: 5.2.1-RC2 (15th Feb 2004)
/usr/src ufs, /usr/obj ufs
make buildworld 19808.17 real 17126.29 user 1965.42 sys
make -j2 buildworld 20085.05 real 17314.00 user 2139.92 sys
make -j3 buildworld 20182.12 real 17467.14 user 2175.41 sys
########################################################################
Intel PII, 333MHz, single CPU
256MB RAM
UDMA33 WDC AC26400R
running: 5.2-CURRENT (20th Feb 2004)
building: 5.2.1-RC2 (15th Feb 2004)
/usr/src ufs, /usr/obj ufs
make buildworld 16916.70 real 14185.83 user 2028.82 sys
make -j2 buildworld 16991.71 real 14445.95 user 2201.29 sys
make -j3 buildworld 17042.71 real 14532.71 user 2235.48 sys
make -j4 buildworld 17171.15 real 14583.99 user 2242.81 sys
And I don't think CURRENT is that "faster" than 5.2.1. Why does (my) alpha
performs so bad? Some ideas? Is that behaviour common for FreeBSD/alpha or
did I missed something in my consideration?
-- Oliver Lehmann http://www.pofo.de/ http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Gary Stanley: "Re: strange performance dip shown by iozone"
- Next in thread: Alain Fauconnet: "Re: Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld)"
- Reply: Alain Fauconnet: "Re: Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld)"
- Reply: Nikos Ntarmos: "Re: Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld)"
- Maybe reply: Oliver Lehmann: "Re: Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld)"
- Maybe reply: Chuck Swiger: "Re: Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld)"
- Reply: Wilko Bulte: "Re: Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld)"
- Reply: David O'Brien: "Re: Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|