The effects of WITNESS and INVARIANTS
From: Willem Jan Withagen (wjw_at_withagen.nl)
Date: 02/24/04
- Previous message: Alain Fauconnet: "Re: Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld)"
- Next in thread: Robert Watson: "Re: The effects of WITNESS and INVARIANTS"
- Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: The effects of WITNESS and INVARIANTS"
- Reply: David O'Brien: "Re: The effects of WITNESS and INVARIANTS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 19:43:11 +0100
Hi,
Just out of curriousity, and 'cause I've got some idle boxes, I started to do
some (NFS-)performance testing.
There is still a long way to go, but I've but a first obvious result online
running on the local server disk.
It makes the claims of the effects of WITNESS and INVARIANTS very obvious.
Look especially at the graph for "Sequential block read".
You might want to have a look at:
http://withagen.dyndns.org/FreeBSD/nfs-performance/index.html.
Note that no NFS data is included.
I have some Bonnie-NFS data, but need to write accompanying test and conclusions
for it.
Suggestions are more than welcomed.
--WjW
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Alain Fauconnet: "Re: Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld)"
- Next in thread: Robert Watson: "Re: The effects of WITNESS and INVARIANTS"
- Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: The effects of WITNESS and INVARIANTS"
- Reply: David O'Brien: "Re: The effects of WITNESS and INVARIANTS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]