Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)
From: Poul-Henning Kamp (phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk)
Date: 08/20/04
- Previous message: Petri Helenius: "Re: RAID-3?"
- In reply to: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Next in thread: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Reply: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Reply: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 21:58:48 +0200
In message <20040820193547.GZ30151@darkness.comp.waw.pl>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek w
rites:
>As you can see RAID5 is only faster in READ tests for 15 and 100 processes
>working in parallel. As I can see, RAID3 is faster in all the rest tests.
>
>PS. I wonder about read optimization, so parity component can be also
> used for reading in round-robin fashion...
I would far rather have an option to give me data-integrity checking ?
-- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Petri Helenius: "Re: RAID-3?"
- In reply to: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Next in thread: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Reply: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Reply: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|