Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)
From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek (pjd_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 08/20/04
- Previous message: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: RAID-3?"
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Next in thread: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 22:45:39 +0200 To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 09:58:48PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
+> In message <20040820193547.GZ30151@darkness.comp.waw.pl>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek w
+> rites:
+>
+> >As you can see RAID5 is only faster in READ tests for 15 and 100 processes
+> >working in parallel. As I can see, RAID3 is faster in all the rest tests.
+> >
+> >PS. I wonder about read optimization, so parity component can be also
+> > used for reading in round-robin fashion...
+>
+> I would far rather have an option to give me data-integrity checking ?
Yes, I'm wondering about this as well...
-- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.FreeBSD.org pjd@FreeBSD.org http://garage.freebsd.pl FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: RAID-3?"
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Next in thread: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|