Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)
From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey (grog_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 08/21/04
- Previous message: Greg 'groggy' Lehey: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- In reply to: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Next in thread: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Reply: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 18:02:07 +0930 To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
On Saturday, 21 August 2004 at 10:06:14 +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> So as you can see there are no difference in reading (actually
> reading in degraded mode is even a bit faster, hard to say why).
I would have half expected this. If you're reading parity as well,
then without spindle sync it will take longer for three I/Os to
complete than 2. In a fractionally different context, I describe a
similar result for RAID-5 at
http://www.vinumvm.org/vinum/implementation.html.
Greg
-- Note: I discard all HTML mail unseen. Finger grog@FreeBSD.org for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Greg 'groggy' Lehey: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- In reply to: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Next in thread: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Reply: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|