Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)
From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek (pjd_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 08/21/04
- Previous message: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- In reply to: Greg 'groggy' Lehey: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Next in thread: Greg 'groggy' Lehey: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Reply: Greg 'groggy' Lehey: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 10:37:57 +0200 To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org>
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 06:02:07PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
+> On Saturday, 21 August 2004 at 10:06:14 +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
+> > So as you can see there are no difference in reading (actually
+> > reading in degraded mode is even a bit faster, hard to say why).
+>
+> I would have half expected this. If you're reading parity as well,
+> then without spindle sync it will take longer for three I/Os to
+> complete than 2.
I'm not sure if I understand you well...
In RAID3, when array is complete you don't use parity component for
reading at all. So in complete mode, as well as in degraded mode RAID3
is using only two components for reading.
-- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.FreeBSD.org pjd@FreeBSD.org http://garage.freebsd.pl FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- In reply to: Greg 'groggy' Lehey: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Next in thread: Greg 'groggy' Lehey: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Reply: Greg 'groggy' Lehey: "Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|