Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS)

From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek (pjd_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 08/22/04

  • Next message: Nikolay Pavlov: "Poor results of network perfomance with 5.2.1-p9." 
    Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 23:35:18 +0200
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>

    On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 09:58:48PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
    +> In message <20040820193547.GZ30151@darkness.comp.waw.pl>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek w
    +> rites:
    +>
    +> >As you can see RAID5 is only faster in READ tests for 15 and 100 processes
    +> >working in parallel. As I can see, RAID3 is faster in all the rest tests.
    +> >
    +> >PS. I wonder about read optimization, so parity component can be also
    +> > used for reading in round-robin fashion...
    +>
    +> I would far rather have an option to give me data-integrity checking ?

    ...Just want to note, that I implemented both algorithms
    ("round-robin reading" and "verify reading") and committed to HEAD.
    Enjoy:) 

    -- 
Pawel Jakub Dawidek                       http://www.FreeBSD.org
pjd@FreeBSD.org                           http://garage.freebsd.pl
FreeBSD committer                         Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!

  • Next message: Nikolay Pavlov: "Poor results of network perfomance with 5.2.1-p9."