Benchmark: NetBSD 2.0 beats FreeBSD 5.3 in server performance

From: Hubert Feyrer (hubert_at_feyrer.de)
Date: 01/06/05

  • Next message: Igor Shmukler: "Re: Benchmark: NetBSD 2.0 beats FreeBSD 5.3 in server performance" 
    Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:19:37 +0100 (CET)
To: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.org

    Gregory McGarry asked me to host and advertize this paper for him:

    Abstract: ``With the recent releases of NetBSD 2.0 and FreeBSD 5.3 operating
    system, many new and exciting features have been implemented. Both criticism
    and commendation on performance, reliability and scalability have been directed
    towards these releases.

    This paper presents a suite of benchmarks and results for comparing the
    performance of these operating systems. The benchmarks target core operating
    system functionality, server scalability and thread implementation. These
    benchmarks are useful server-based criteria for demanding applications such as
    loaded webservers, databases, and voice-over-IP (VoIP) media relays. The
    results indicate that NetBSD has surpassed FreeBSD in performance on nearly
    every benchmark and is poised to grab the title of the best operating system
    for the server environment.''

    URL: http://www.feyrer.de/NetBSD/gmcgarry/

      - Hubert 

    -- 
NetBSD - Free AND Open!      (And of course secure, portable, yadda yadda)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Igor Shmukler: "Re: Benchmark: NetBSD 2.0 beats FreeBSD 5.3 in server performance"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Anandtechs Conroe vs. FX60
      ... obviously Conroe. ... Why would they introduce desktop before server, ... Benchmarks is a little generous a term for what was revealed at IDF. ... Intel's MFG has been the best, ...
      (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips)
    • Re: Doubt : ASP.NET problem
      ... Yes, there are differences betwen servers and operating systems, but that is ... Communication is the process of providing and receiving meaningful ... meaning of the term "Garbage in, Garbage out," which I didn't invent. ... My husband had to re-configure our Server operating ...
      (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet.buildingcontrols)
    • Re: Doubt : ASP.NET problem
      ... Yes, there are differences betwen servers and operating systems, but that is ... Communication is the process of providing and receiving meaningful ... meaning of the term "Garbage in, Garbage out," which I didn't invent. ... My husband had to re-configure our Server operating ...
      (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
    • Re: Xeon Woodcrest Preys On Opteron
      ... Who knows what the correlation is between these and Lightwave on a new ... Win to Woodcrest ... which is that the K8 is not competitive for server workloads. ... I'll come back to you with the figures, when benchmarks have been ...
      (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips)
    • Re: Computer Management | Sessions - Are there limitations?
      ... > All MS operating systems other than the server version accept only 10 ... > Buy and install a true server operating system. ... hypothetically if I had an XP Pro machine with a shared printer. ... >> Is there a known limit to the number of connections an XP Prro can accept? ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)