NFS and SAMBA on RELENG_5 vs RELENG_4
From: Mike Tancsa (mike_at_sentex.net)
Date: 01/11/05
- Previous message: hydros: "pppoe perfomance"
- Next in thread: Eric Anderson: "Re: NFS and SAMBA on RELENG_5 vs RELENG_4"
- Reply: Eric Anderson: "Re: NFS and SAMBA on RELENG_5 vs RELENG_4"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:17:07 -0500 To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Has anyone looked at the performance of a UP* system on RELENG_4 vs
RELENG_5 as an NFS and SAMBA server ? I need to deploy such a box and was
wondering if someone has run through this exercise recently** ?
I know quite often when the ugly asterisk laden word "benchmark" comes up
the rush of groans is deafening. But if you dont use benchmarking programs
as _part_ of the evaluation process, how do you determine what will perform
best for you ?
---Mike
*Its not of interest to me if SMP makes a difference. The hardware is UP.
**I found some discussions from Oct / Nov of 2004, but that was related
more to a bug in the em driver affecting RELENG_5 network performance
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net
Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: hydros: "pppoe perfomance"
- Next in thread: Eric Anderson: "Re: NFS and SAMBA on RELENG_5 vs RELENG_4"
- Reply: Eric Anderson: "Re: NFS and SAMBA on RELENG_5 vs RELENG_4"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|