Re: FreeBSD 5.3 I/O Performance / Linux 2.6.10 | Continued Discussion
From: Matthias Buelow (mkb_at_incubus.de)
Date: 01/25/05
- Previous message: Arne : "Re: FreeBSD 5.3 I/O Performance / Linux 2.6.10 | Continued Discussion"
- In reply to: Petri Helenius: "Re: FreeBSD 5.3 I/O Performance / Linux 2.6.10 | Continued Discussion"
- Next in thread: Petri Helenius: "Re: FreeBSD 5.3 I/O Performance / Linux 2.6.10 | Continued Discussion"
- Reply: Petri Helenius: "Re: FreeBSD 5.3 I/O Performance / Linux 2.6.10 | Continued Discussion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:55:27 +0100 To: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi>
Petri Helenius wrote:
> Are you sure you aren't comparing filesystems with different mount
> options? Async comes to mind first.
a) ext3 and xfs are logging filesystems, so the problem with
asynchronous metadata updates possibly corrupting the filesystem on a
crash doesn't arise.
b) asynchronous metadata updates wouldn't have any performance benefit
on a dd if=/dev/zero of=tstfile.
c) please cut down your quotes, and write your answers below or between
the quoted text, instead of the outlook text-above-fullquote style. thanks.
mkb.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Arne : "Re: FreeBSD 5.3 I/O Performance / Linux 2.6.10 | Continued Discussion"
- In reply to: Petri Helenius: "Re: FreeBSD 5.3 I/O Performance / Linux 2.6.10 | Continued Discussion"
- Next in thread: Petri Helenius: "Re: FreeBSD 5.3 I/O Performance / Linux 2.6.10 | Continued Discussion"
- Reply: Petri Helenius: "Re: FreeBSD 5.3 I/O Performance / Linux 2.6.10 | Continued Discussion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]