Automated performance testing
From: Jim C. Nasby (decibel_at_decibel.org)
Date: 01/31/05
- Previous message: Claus Guttesen: "FreeBSD 5.3 I/O Performance / Linux 2.6.10 | Continued Discussion"
- Next in thread: Robert Watson: "Re: Automated performance testing"
- Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: Automated performance testing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:05:27 -0600 To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
With all the discussion of performance testing between 4.11, 5.3, and
Linux, would it be useful to make performance testing part of the
automated testing that already occurs (via tinderbox, iirc). Doing so
might make it easier to detect performance impacting changes, as well as
making performance testing easier in general.
-- Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel@decibel.org Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?" _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Claus Guttesen: "FreeBSD 5.3 I/O Performance / Linux 2.6.10 | Continued Discussion"
- Next in thread: Robert Watson: "Re: Automated performance testing"
- Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: Automated performance testing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|