Re: FreeBSD 5.3 I/O Performance / Linux 2.6.10 | Continued Discussion

From: Mike Tancsa (mike_at_sentex.net)
Date: 02/01/05

  • Next message: Nick Pavlica: "Re: FreeBSD 5.3 I/O Performance / Linux 2.6.10 | Continued Discussion" 
    Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 11:42:18 -0500
To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org

    I posted up an excel workbook at
    http://www.tancsa.com/iozone-tests.xls.bz2

    This has the results of iozone on RELENG_5, HEAD, HEAD with
    debug.mpsafevfs=1 and LINUX 2.6.10 on ext3 as well as some quick NFS tests
    against RELENG_5 and LINUX as servers with FreeBSD RELENG-5 clients.

    Once again, the hardware is the same. The boot OS drives have changed, but
    the tests were all done against one large RAID5 partition.

    HTT disabled in the BIOS, using SCHED_4BSD on a 3ware 8xxx controller in
    RAID5 with 4 drives. dmesg attached.

            ---Mike

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

  • Next message: Nick Pavlica: "Re: FreeBSD 5.3 I/O Performance / Linux 2.6.10 | Continued Discussion"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: FreeBSD 5.3 I/O Performance / Linux 2.6.10 and dragonfly
      ... postmark is pretty well the same as linux. ... >This has the results of iozone on RELENG_5, HEAD, HEAD with ... >the tests were all done against one large RAID5 partition. ... >RAID5 with 4 drives. ...
      (freebsd-performance)
    • Re: Bad Clusters
      ... On one of the external drives, ... indicating the clusters were not really fixed by Windows, ... > head positioning wobble that reduces accuracy of pickup, ... i.e. where the head touches the disk and thus damages it. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • New System planning -- Summary
      ... >To build a system that to run Linux (probably Ubuntu or Kubuntu, ... > Flat Panel monitor, Make? ... You want huge hard drives with 16 MB buffers. ... Two fast 160 GB drives will work, but not RAID, one 250 MB drive is cheaper. ...
      (Ubuntu)
    • Re: newbie question <VERY_LONG>
      ... That's what the Linux Documentation Project is for. ... That's only because the original DOS used the name to identify the type ... >partition, unless it occupies the entire disk as a primary partition. ... When the box got updated to DOS 5, the drives ...
      (alt.os.linux.redhat)
    • RE: Advice regarding servers and Wiping Drives after testing
      ... drive head placement. ... No. Magnetic fields operate perpendicular to what we term reality (this ... Advice regarding servers and Wiping Drives after testing ...
      (Security-Basics)