Re: performance modifications

From: Claus Guttesen (cguttesen_at_yahoo.dk)
Date: 03/11/05

  • Next message: Hroi Sigurdsson: "Re: performance modifications"
    Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:21:49 +0100 (CET)
    To: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi>
    
    

    > >No, this kernel-change is (fortunately) completely
    > >transparent in relation to apache.
    > >
    > Ok, that was not the impression I got from accf_http
    > man page.

    I checked apache.org just to be shure :-)

    http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/performance/2003-07/0071.html
    gives some hints, and
    http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/core.html#acceptfilter
    says that SO_ACCEPTFILTER is enabled by default. So
    when

    options ACCEPT_FILTER_DATA
    options ACCEPT_FILTER_HTTP

    is compiled into the kernel or accf_http is loaded,
    apache "should" utilize this option.

    regards
    Claus

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: Hroi Sigurdsson: "Re: performance modifications"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: performance modifications
      ... >transparent in relation to apache. ... that was not the impression I got from accf_http man page. ... Pete ...
      (freebsd-performance)
    • Re: performance modifications
      ... >> transparent in relation to apache. ... that was not the impression I got from accf_http man page. ... A setsockopt call is needed to use the filters. ...
      (freebsd-performance)
    • Re: performance modifications
      ... this kernel-change is completely ... transparent in relation to apache. ...
      (freebsd-performance)