mbuf underrun, zombie process
From: Bánhalmi Csaba (banhalmi_at_field.hu)
Date: 03/18/05
- Previous message: João Carlos Mendes Luís: "Re: vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem is a bit low"
- Next in thread: Brian Reichert: "Re: mbuf underrun, zombie process"
- Reply: Brian Reichert: "Re: mbuf underrun, zombie process"
- Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: mbuf underrun, zombie process"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:26:40 +0100
hi!
i hope i'm writin' to the right list this time..
my problem is the following: my server has high traffic on 100mbit dedicated
line (around 10-11,5mb/s all day)
with approx ~100-120 tcp connection. the nic is an intel pro 100, used with
polling.
now..when i set my data proxy's tcp window size to optimal, the network
traffic dies in 2-3hours and
the process become zombie, can't even kill.
when i use small or large tcp window size the data proxy is stable, however
the traffic is not good, dsl
users complain, high speed copy is slow, etc.
i don't really know what to do, what sysctl should increase or anything, if
anyone had same problem,
please post..
my machine is a pc, amd 2000+, around 50-60% used cpu, 512 ram and this is
the only high load process.
i changed couple sysctl settings:
kern.ipc.nmbclusters=32768
kern.polling.enable=1
kern.ipc.somaxconn=4096
net.inet.udp.maxdgram=32768
net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0
net.inet.ip.portrange.randomized=0
ps: i tried to increase nmbclusters (65536, 131072), increased somaxconn
(8192) and
tcp.recvspace/sendspace to 65536, but didn't helped.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: João Carlos Mendes Luís: "Re: vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem is a bit low"
- Next in thread: Brian Reichert: "Re: mbuf underrun, zombie process"
- Reply: Brian Reichert: "Re: mbuf underrun, zombie process"
- Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: mbuf underrun, zombie process"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]