Re: performance modifications
ray_at_redshift.com
Date: 04/09/05
- Previous message: Sunil Sunder Raj: "Re: performance modifications"
- In reply to: Sunil Sunder Raj: "Re: performance modifications"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 08:25:02 -0700 To: "Sunil Sunder Raj" <unixtools@hotmail.com>, joseph.koshy@gmail.com
Thanks Sunil,
I'm running a completely stripped down apache and PHP config here. As you say,
it makes a huge difference if you don't rely on those modules.
Thanks!
Ray
At 10:10 AM 4/9/2005 +0000, Sunil Sunder Raj wrote:
| Hi,
| There a a few apache config changes which really bump up the performance.
|
| Disable mod_status.so which decreases a few system calls.
| Disable FollowSymLinks wherever used.
| If possible remove the <Directory /> directive.
|
| Regards
| SSR
|
| >From: ray@redshift.com
| >To: Joseph Koshy <joseph.koshy@gmail.com>
| >CC: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
| >Subject: Re: performance modifications
| >Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:30:15 -0800
| >
| >| > I'm wondering if anyone on the list has a good source for
| >| > the major sysctl settings and/or kernel settings that can be
| >| > modified in order to bring up the performance level on a
| >| > FreeBSD 5.3 machine that is used with apache under heavy
| >| > load.
| >|
| >| There is the tuning(7) manual page.
| >
| >Yes, have read those from start to finish. Just wondering if there are
| >other
| >areas to look into that may not be covered there.
| >
| >| There are better web servers than Apache for demanding loads;
| >| ones that used a non-forking, event-driven I/O model.
| >| Aolserver and thttpd come to mind.
| >
| >I tried thttpd a number of years ago, but due to its limited cgi support
| >(at
| >least at the time) I didn't do too much with it. It did seem fast,
| >however.
| >
| >| Yaoping Ruan and Vivek Pai from Princeton have reported
| >| excellent results with their "Flash" [1] web server. While
| >| many of their recommended changes to FreeBSD have been folded
| >| into the base source, I'm not sure how many popular web-servers
| >| are using these speedups.
| >|
| >| [1] Making the "Box" Transparent: System Call Performance as a
| >| First-class Result
| >| Yaoping Ruan, Vivek Pai
| >| http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~yruan/debox/debox.pdf
| >
| >Okay, great, thanks. I'll check into that area. My biggest problem right
| >now
| >is that PHP brings down the speed of everything. I may have to go back to
| >Perl
| >and use mod_perl or look into some other alternatives. The main thing I
| >wanted
| >to do was get the OS running at it's best, so the benchmarks were not being
| >affected by some area of FreeBSD.
| >
| >Anyway, thanks very much for the info!
| >
| >Ray
| >
| >_______________________________________________
| >freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
| >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
| >To unsubscribe, send any mail to
| >"freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
|
|
|
|
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Sunil Sunder Raj: "Re: performance modifications"
- In reply to: Sunil Sunder Raj: "Re: performance modifications"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
