Re: some simple nfs-benchmarks on 5.4 RC2

From: Eric Anderson (anderson_at_centtech.com)
Date: 04/19/05

  • Next message: Claus Guttesen: "Re: some simple nfs-benchmarks on 5.4 RC2"
    Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 08:30:04 -0500
    To: Claus Guttesen <kometen@gmail.com>
    
    

    Claus Guttesen wrote:
    >>What does gstat look like on the server when you are doing this?
    >>Also - does a dd locally on the server give the same results? You should get
    >>about double that I would estimate locally direct to disk. What about a dd over
    >>NFS?
    >
    >
    > dd-command:
    >
    > dd if=/dev/zero of=/nfssrv/dd.tst bs=1024 count=1048576
    >
    > on client:
    > 1073741824 bytes transferred in 24.787112 secs (43318553 bytes/sec)
    > gstat showed approx. 30.000-52.000 KB/s.
    >
    > on nfs-server:
    > 1073741824 bytes transferred in 23.368815 secs (45947637 bytes/sec)
    > gstat showed approx. 45.000-46.000 KB/s.
    >
    > The funny thing is that the outputrate fluxuates more dd'ing from the
    > client (remote) and is more consistent dd'ing on the server (locally).
    >
    >
    >>What is the server spending its time doing? (top?)
    >
    >
    > nfsd.
    >
    >
    >>If you are looking for the best performance, you might try a RAID 0+1 (or 10
    >>possibly) instead of RAID 5.
    >
    >
    > I chosed raid 5 to maximize space.

    What state is nfsd in? Can you send the output of this:

    ps -auxw|grep nfsd

    while the server is slammed?

    I think you are disk bound.. You should not be disk bound at this point with a
    good RAID controller..

    Eric

    -- 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Eric Anderson        Sr. Systems Administrator        Centaur Technology
    A lost ounce of gold may be found, a lost moment of time never.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Claus Guttesen: "Re: some simple nfs-benchmarks on 5.4 RC2"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: reconstructing a RAID5 volume taking FOREVER?!?
      ... Server is running AIX5.2, ML04. ... sisioa0 is a PCI-X Dual Channel U320 SCSI RAID Adapter. ... Reference Guide for AIX" to reconstruct the RAID disk. ...
      (comp.unix.aix)
    • Re: Disck write latency > 50ms
      ... Also how can I tell how many users are connected to the Exchange 2003 ... long IO operations against a given physical disk are taking. ... criteria from "Optimizing Storage for Exchange Server 2003" to alert; ... we are to but another RAID card for this too. ...
      (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
    • RE: Dive configuration on new cluster
      ... individual physical disk and file share resources for user and department ... Make sure you have enough nics for Public and Private networks. ... in each server. ... > Looking for suggestion on the best way to set up the raid levels, array, ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.clustering)
    • Re: RAID 0/RAID 5???
      ... disks, can offer better performance than RAID5, at the cost of disk space. ... RAID0 or RAID 1+0. ... Of course the cost in drives between these two is a factor, and for a server ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
    • Re: Disaster Recovery Planning
      ... a failover cluster is not a DR solution as both nodes need ... to share the disk resources. ... disk in a RAID 5 array dies then fine, hotswap it; if 2 disks in a RAID ... > Also you have option of standby SQL server whish is connected to working SQL ...
      (microsoft.public.sqlserver.server)