Re: some simple nfs-benchmarks on 5.4 RC2
From: Claus Guttesen (kometen_at_gmail.com)
Date: 04/20/05
- Previous message: Jin Guojun [VFFS]: "Re: Performance Intel Pro 1000 MT (PWLA8490MT)"
- In reply to: Eric Anderson: "Re: some simple nfs-benchmarks on 5.4 RC2"
- Next in thread: Eric Anderson: "Re: some simple nfs-benchmarks on 5.4 RC2"
- Reply: Eric Anderson: "Re: some simple nfs-benchmarks on 5.4 RC2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:03:16 +0200 To: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com>
> That's about what I expected. RAID 5 depends on fast xor, so a slow processor
> in a hardware RAID5 box will slow you down a lot.
>
> You should try taking the two RAID5's (6 disks each) created on your original
> controller and striping those together (RAID 50) - this should get you some
> better performance, probably not as close as the amr device, but I would guess
> somewhere in the 80-90mb/s range.
This can't be done in hardware, since atabeast only supports raid 0,
1, 4 and 5. But I will definitively have this in my mind this when we
get a new storage-system (a different one).
Thank you for your guidance.
regards
Claus
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Jin Guojun [VFFS]: "Re: Performance Intel Pro 1000 MT (PWLA8490MT)"
- In reply to: Eric Anderson: "Re: some simple nfs-benchmarks on 5.4 RC2"
- Next in thread: Eric Anderson: "Re: some simple nfs-benchmarks on 5.4 RC2"
- Reply: Eric Anderson: "Re: some simple nfs-benchmarks on 5.4 RC2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|