Re: Channel bonding.
From: Eric Anderson (anderson_at_centtech.com)
Date: 04/22/05
- Previous message: Sean: "Channel bonding."
- In reply to: Sean: "Channel bonding."
- Next in thread: Sean: "Re: Channel bonding."
- Reply: Sean: "Re: Channel bonding."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 11:05:57 -0500 To: Sean <seancody@gmail.com>
Sean wrote:
> I've been experimenting with the idea of doing channel bonding as a
> means of improving the performance of some heavily used file servers.
> Currently I am using a single Intel 1000MT interface on each file
> server and it has rather lack luster performance.
[..snip..]
> In case anyone has any ideas I've included the 'specs' of the hardware
> below.
>
> Hardware:
> Dual Intel Xeon CPU 2.66GHz
> Intel Server SE7501BR2 Motherboard
> 2X 512 MB Registered ECC DDR RAM
> 3ware 7500-12 (12x120GB, RAID-5)
> Intel PRO/1000 MT Dual Port (em0,1)
> Intel PRO/1000 MT (On board) (em2)
>
> Switch:
> Extreme Black Diamond 6800
> Gigabit Blade: G24T^3 51052
[..snip..]
Are the gig nics in 64bit slots? 32bit slots can slow you down a bunch.
Also, I've seen some cases where the PCI bus itself is the bottleneck
with multiple high-IO boards installed on the same bus.
Eric
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology A lost ounce of gold may be found, a lost moment of time never. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Sean: "Channel bonding."
- In reply to: Sean: "Channel bonding."
- Next in thread: Sean: "Re: Channel bonding."
- Reply: Sean: "Re: Channel bonding."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]