Re: 64bit CPUs
From: Robert Watson (rwatson_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 05/02/05
- Previous message: ray_at_redshift.com: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "64bit CPUs"
- Next in thread: Joseph Koshy: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- Reply: Joseph Koshy: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- Reply: João Carlos Mendes Luís: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 04:48:12 +0100 (BST) To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
On Sun, 1 May 2005, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> A somewhat obvious question to some perhaps, but what server application
> mix on FreeBSD today sees an improvement using 64bit CPUs ? In my ISP
> centric world, my big apps are BIND, IMAP/POP3, httpd via apache, SMTP,
> AV and SPAM scanning, and firewalls/routing. Apart from larger RAM, why
> would these benefit from the 64bit world ? Or would they ?
RAM/address space is the big reason. In fact, applications compiled for
64-bits may well run slower than 32-bit ones running on the 64-bit kernel.
Note that systems like Solaris default build many programs as 32-bit,
since there's no benefit to running ls(1) with a 64-bit address space.
On the other hand, if you need a large memory system, running a 64-bit
system will give you better support and utilization than a 32-bit system
runing with PAE, at least on FreeBSD.
Robert N M Watson
_______________________________________________
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: ray_at_redshift.com: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- In reply to: Mike Tancsa: "64bit CPUs"
- Next in thread: Joseph Koshy: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- Reply: Joseph Koshy: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- Reply: João Carlos Mendes Luís: "Re: 64bit CPUs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]